Exercise;
Correction
Wow…where do I start!?, it’s been a roller coaster of a
few months for me, I have moved up to London, got a new job where I’m working
12 hour days 6 days a week and I won a weekend away to Barcelona, which I
managed to take, only to badly sprain my ankle at the airport on the way back!,
so trying to take photographs has been a bit difficult, however, I have used
some of the images that I took in Barcelona and some afterwards, were I Managed
to hobble around!.
So, the object of this exercise is how to correct an
image that is technically “faulty” the first in this exercise is dust specks. I
have chosen an image that I took in Barcelona. I unfortunately didn’t realise until
I got back, how any dust specs there actually were, it does however, work for
this exercise.
Part One;
This
is the image with the dust specs.
1/320 seconds at f/25.0
As
there are birds in this picture, I have attached a magnified image to be able
to see a bit clearer which is which.
Here is the magnified image.
This is the final edited image, with all the necessary
corrections made.
1/320 seconds at f/25.0
I used the spot healing brush tool to correct all of the
dust spots, the tool worked so well, I had no need to use the clone stamp tool.
In the exercise it poses a few poignant questions,
firstly, is using the clone stamp tool as innocent as using the spot healing
tool?.
I have used the clone stamp in the next image and in the
past on a number of occasions, I think, for me personally, I see no difference
in using the spot healing brush tool to the clone stamp tool, in both cases you
are still correcting/altering the image in two different ways, which leads on
to the next question; - is this speck real from the scene, or caused by dust on
the sensor – should you remove it and does it bother you?.
I would like to answer this with personal feeling, as
this is a question of personal/moral values, I feel that the specks are
different from the scene and only an artefact caused by dust on the sensor,
which, no matter how many times you try to correct it, by cleaning all the time
and taking it to a professional to get cleaned, can’t be helped, therefore, I
have no problem in removing that speck from the image.
On
the other hand, with regards to the clone stamp tool, when using it, I
sometimes feel guilty!, especially when I am replacing sections of an image to
improve it, for example, after I have cropped an image by rotation, and the
shot would look better if it had the top, bottom or sides of the image, rather
than another crop, I will sometime replace the corners, that’s when I think, I
should have taking it correctly in the first place. Then there are times when I
feel it is necessary and not a moral issue, if it improves the image due to circumstances
out of your control then I feel it is justified.
Part Two;
I
had to use an image that had a polygon flare and use the clone stamp tool to
remove the flare. Here is the original image, taken at sunrise on the
Bonneville Salt Flats in Northern Utah.
1/160 seconds at f/8.0
Here is the edited image.
1/160 seconds at f/8.0
No comments:
Post a Comment